Barbara Haas vs Julia Thiem Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L L L L L L L
Form
L L W W L L L W L LHead To Head: Haas 1 - 0 Thiem
They have played 2 sets in total, with Haas winning 2 and Thiem winning 0. The last match between Haas and Thiem was at the Portschach, 25-08-2014, First, Clay with Barbara Haas getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Barbara Haas | 1 |
| Julia Thiem | 0 |
Portschach(25-08-2014)
6
1
6
3
| Haas | Stats | Thiem |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 895 | Ranking | Ret. |
| 133 | Highest Rank | 890 |
| 29 | Age | 34 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 16 | Titles | 0 |
| 63% (352-207) | Career Total W/L | 55% (46-38) |
| $230,016 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Rybakina VS Svitolina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Dzumhur VS Arnaldi PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-3 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Barbara Haas Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Viktoriya Tomova
Player
Barbara Haas
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
54%
(
20 of
37)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miriam Bianca Bulgaru
Player
Barbara Haas
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
29 of
45)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Erika Andreeva
Player
Barbara Haas
44%
(
32 of
73)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasia Zakharova
Player
Barbara Haas
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
5
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nina Potocnik
Player
Barbara Haas
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
6
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
28%
(
5 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
48%
(
29 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ya-Yi Yang
Player
Barbara Haas
74%
(
61 of
82)
1st Serve %
73%
(
53 of
73)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
44%
(
36 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Misaki Matsuda
Player
Barbara Haas
85%
(
46 of
54)
1st Serve %
50%
(
26 of
52)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Barbara Haas
Player
Karolina Kubanova
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
78%
(
40 of
51)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
1
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
24 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Barbara Haas
Player
Diana Marcinkevica
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
27 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
Player
Barbara Haas
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Julia Thiem Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Natalie Proese
Player
Julia Thiem
53%
(
8 of
15)
1st Serve %
74%
(
25 of
34)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
63%
(
5 of
8)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
100%
(
7 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
28
Total Points Won
20
|
4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Samantha Harris
Player
Julia Thiem
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
48%
(
29 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julia Thiem
Player
Carlotta Romito
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
4
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
22%
(
7 of
32)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
48%
(
27 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasia Yakimova
Player
Julia Thiem
75%
(
56 of
75)
1st Serve %
72%
(
53 of
74)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
31 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(0) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Deborah Chiesa
Player
Julia Thiem
40%
(
20 of
50)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
11
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Polona Rebersak
Player
Julia Thiem
58%
(
53 of
92)
1st Serve %
69%
(
60 of
87)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
43%
(
40 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
87)
94
Total Points Won
85
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 5-7 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Anna Zaja
Player
Julia Thiem
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve %
70%
(
23 of
33)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
48
Total Points Won
16
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (352/207) | Win/Loss | 55% (46/38) |
| 59% (776/536) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (98/87) |
| 54% (6411/5523) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (862/735) |
| 66% (127/65) | Hard Win/Loss | 68% (13/6) |
| 65% (203/111) | Clay Win/Loss | 51% (24/23) |
| 41% (16/23) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (9/9) |
| 43% (6/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0.01 |
| 360 | Aces Total | 4 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.07 |
| 1697 | Total Double Faults | 57 |
| 1:10:16 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 565.28 | Average Opponent Rank | 482.19 |
| 66% (17054/25855) | 1st Serve % | 70% (699/1002) |
| 59% (10020/17054) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (380/699) |
| 41% (3578/8801) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (117/302) |
| 49% (1802/3642) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (57/113) |
| 49% (12737/26205) | Return Points Win % | 46% (416/910) |
| 44% (18/23) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (1/2) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 67% (8/4) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 36% (20/35) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 64% (189/105) | Challenger W/L | 36% (4/7) |
| 75% (116/38) | Futures W/L | 58% (42/31) |
| 63% (347/552) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (43/80) |
| 75% (3/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 52% (55/106) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 25% (3/12) |
| 62% (120/193) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (10/17) |
| 88% (318/281) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (42/38) |
| 12% (318/37) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (42/4) |
| 29% (241/71) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (42/8) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
